Anfield - agrandissement.

[kikinou]

la difference c'est qu'auschwitz l'entrée etait gratuite

[Brittanyred]

la difference c'est qu'auschwitz l'entrée etait gratuite

Mouais, enfin vu les fringues et les dents en or qu'ils leur ont piqué, je ne suis pas sûr que le terme "gratuit" soit de rigueur.

Bon appétit!

[kikinou]

Mouais, enfin vu les fringues et les dents en or qu'ils leur ont piqué, je ne suis pas sûr que le terme "gratuit" soit de rigueur.

Bon appétit!

ils n'avaient pas le shoa

[redshirt]

Non. Il pose durement la question mais c'est vrai qu'un stade c'est fait pour prendre du plaisir et jouer au football. Depuis quand les morts souhaitent-ils aux vivants d'être enchainés dans leur souvenir? Ne pas oublier est bien différent d'être assommé de commémorations. Pour l'instant, on n'oublie pas, et on demande réparation, notamment au Sun. Il y a une commémoration très émouvante de surcroît chaque année. C'est bien, et c'est suffisant.

Life goes on, à Hillsborough comme au Heysel (Stade du Roi Baudoin aujourd'hui). La plus belle réponse à la fatalité, c'est de continuer de prendre du plaisir avec ce maillot rouge, envers et contre tout.

Je suis d'accord que de fil en aiguille on est allé un peu loin, et que quand on va au stade c'est pour avoir du bon temps, mais on fesait rien de mal et le post était quand même plutot brutal je trouve il faut pas exagérer

[Pierre]

la difference c'est qu'auschwitz l'entrée etait gratuite

Non mais serieux, pourquoi vous voulez appeller le stade Hillsborough, il faut pas les oubliers, mais faut pas rester dans la tristesse, sinon a chaque fois qu'on va au stade, on va se reparler de ces mauvais moments..

[redshirt]

Non mais serieux, pourquoi vous voulez appeller le stade Hillsborough, il faut pas les oubliers, mais faut pas rester dans la tristesse, sinon a chaque fois qu'on va au stade, on va se reparler de ces mauvais moments..

C'est vrai que sur le fond ils ont raison et qu'on s'est enflammé mais question finesse c'est du niveau Panzer là ^^

[Brittanyred]

ils n'avaient pas le shoa

sataniste!

[robbiefowler80]

détail au lieu de lâché un commentaire a deux franc...

Je sais pas vous, mais moi j'ai pas spécialement envie de m’assoir sur un siège qui porte le nom d'un mort...

Pourquoi pas passé ds vidéo de l'accident pendant le you'll never walk alone tant qu'on y est... Ca serait vraiment beau

Non pas lamentable, moi j'aurais dit minable

[Rushie]

Dans The Independent d'aujourd'hui :

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/liverpool-damaged-by-failure-to-build-new-stadium-says-ian-ayre-2304952.html

[Brittanyred]

Dans The Independent d'aujourd'hui :

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/liverpool-damaged-by-failure-to-build-new-stadium-says-ian-ayre-2304952.html

Grazie mile.

[Autumn319]

ça vient du times et c'est récent:

Pressure grows to secure a naming-rights deal to part-fund the construction of a new stadium for the club in Stanley Park

Liverpool are becoming resigned to leaving Anfield and are facing a race against time to attract a naming-rights partner to part-fund the construction of a new stadium in Stanley Park.

Fenway Sports Group's (FSG) review of its stadium options, launched after the takeover of the club in October, is continuing and a decision is yet to be made. But it is understood that the prohibitive costs associated with redeveloping Anfield have made relocating from the club's spiritual home the preferred option.

Liverpool's predicament was thrown into sharper focus when it emerged that Manchester City will announce a stadium naming-rights deal with Etihad, the national airline of Abu Dhabi, today. City are owned by the ruling family of the Gulf state and the deal is estimated to be worth between £10 million and £15 million a year.

City's spending has significantly outstripped Liverpool's since the club were taken over in 2008, but the latest move indicates that the FA Cup winners are moving towards compliance with Uefa's Financial Fair Play regulations, which start in 2013.

As reported in The Times last week, Liverpool City Council has granted the club an extra three months to make a decision on whether or not they will take up the option of a 999-year lease for the Stanley Park site.

The council has, however, made it clear to Liverpool that it is seeking a decision on the lease by late September, leaving FSG only three months to bring its search for a naming-rights partner to a successful conclusion.

A further extension could be sought and granted, but FSG has attempted to pre-empt the possibility of putting itself at the mercy of a council whose patience is wearing thin by placing the responsibility for attracting a naming-rights deal in the hands of its in-house operations team, which is headed by Sam Kennedy, the company president, and based in Boston.

John W. Henry, the Liverpool principal owner, has admitted that "it would be hard to replicate" Anfield's atmosphere anywhere else — a belief that led to a delegation of Boston architects being deputised to conduct a feasibility study into the possibility of Liverpool remaining there.

Financial pressures, though, have reduced the likelihood that Henry will be able to oversee a redevelopment of the stadium, similar to the sympathetic restoration of Fenway Park, the home of the Boston Red Sox, that FSG successfully managed.

A further factor pulling Liverpool away from Anfield is that the price of building a new stadium in Stanley Park could fall by about 15 per cent as a result of the global reduction in construction costs caused by the credit crunch.

When HKS, the Dallas-based architect, first won the contract to build a 60,000-capacity stadium in Stanley Park in 2008, the estimated cost was £310 million, but the figure would now be cut by up to £46 million.

Although HKS was selected by Tom Hicks, Liverpool's previous owner, its proposals are being considered by FSG, as are the plans submitted by AFL, the Manchester-based architect, which was overlooked by Hicks in 2008 despite being the favoured option of Rick Parry, the club's chief executive at the time. Significantly, the two proposals retain planning permission from Liverpool council, meaning building work could begin immediately should FSG give a new stadium the green light.

[vince]

ça vient du times et c'est récent:

Pressure grows to secure a naming-rights deal to part-fund the construction of a new stadium for the club in Stanley Park

Liverpool are becoming resigned to leaving Anfield and are facing a race against time to attract a naming-rights partner to part-fund the construction of a new stadium in Stanley Park.

Fenway Sports Group's (FSG) review of its stadium options, launched after the takeover of the club in October, is continuing and a decision is yet to be made. But it is understood that the prohibitive costs associated with redeveloping Anfield have made relocating from the club's spiritual home the preferred option.

Liverpool's predicament was thrown into sharper focus when it emerged that Manchester City will announce a stadium naming-rights deal with Etihad, the national airline of Abu Dhabi, today. City are owned by the ruling family of the Gulf state and the deal is estimated to be worth between £10 million and £15 million a year.

City's spending has significantly outstripped Liverpool's since the club were taken over in 2008, but the latest move indicates that the FA Cup winners are moving towards compliance with Uefa's Financial Fair Play regulations, which start in 2013.

As reported in The Times last week, Liverpool City Council has granted the club an extra three months to make a decision on whether or not they will take up the option of a 999-year lease for the Stanley Park site.

The council has, however, made it clear to Liverpool that it is seeking a decision on the lease by late September, leaving FSG only three months to bring its search for a naming-rights partner to a successful conclusion.

A further extension could be sought and granted, but FSG has attempted to pre-empt the possibility of putting itself at the mercy of a council whose patience is wearing thin by placing the responsibility for attracting a naming-rights deal in the hands of its in-house operations team, which is headed by Sam Kennedy, the company president, and based in Boston.

John W. Henry, the Liverpool principal owner, has admitted that "it would be hard to replicate" Anfield's atmosphere anywhere else — a belief that led to a delegation of Boston architects being deputised to conduct a feasibility study into the possibility of Liverpool remaining there.

Financial pressures, though, have reduced the likelihood that Henry will be able to oversee a redevelopment of the stadium, similar to the sympathetic restoration of Fenway Park, the home of the Boston Red Sox, that FSG successfully managed.

A further factor pulling Liverpool away from Anfield is that the price of building a new stadium in Stanley Park could fall by about 15 per cent as a result of the global reduction in construction costs caused by the credit crunch.

When HKS, the Dallas-based architect, first won the contract to build a 60,000-capacity stadium in Stanley Park in 2008, the estimated cost was £310 million, but the figure would now be cut by up to £46 million.

Although HKS was selected by Tom Hicks, Liverpool's previous owner, its proposals are being considered by FSG, as are the plans submitted by AFL, the Manchester-based architect, which was overlooked by Hicks in 2008 despite being the favoured option of Rick Parry, the club's chief executive at the time. Significantly, the two proposals retain planning permission from Liverpool council, meaning building work could begin immediately should FSG give a new stadium the green light.

Le message est désormais clair. Anfield a vécu....vive Anfield !! L'avenir sera à Stanley Park et perso j'en suis heureux même si Anfield restera à jamais gravé dans mon coeur. Comme je l'ai déjà dit, la pérennité du club passe par un grand stade et donc des entrées financières substantielles. Reste à trouver le partenaire idoine pour le naming sans baisser notre froc.

Modifié le 8 juillet 2011 par vince

[redshirt]

Le message est désormais clair. Anfield a vécu....vive Anfield !! L'avenir sera à Stanley Park et perso j'en suis heureux même si Anfield restera à jamais gravé dans mon coeur. Comme je l'ai déjà dit, la pérennité du club passe par un grand stade et donc des entrées financières substantielles. Reste à trouver le partenaire idoine pour le naming sans baisser notre froc.

Quand je vois comme Arsenal et Lyon sont en galère question budget avec leur nouveau stade, j'ai un peu peur qu'il nous arrive la même chose...

[vince]

Quand je vois comme Arsenal et Lyon sont en galère question budget avec leur nouveau stade, j'ai un peu peur qu'il nous arrive la même chose...

Incomparable. En France, on achète des maillots seulement quand on gagne. En Angleterre, la passion est telle que le résultat est secondaire et n'impacte pas ou peu sur le merchandising.

[Liverpool93]

Et donc seul Liverpool FC jouera dans cette enceinte pas Everton comme on pouvait l'imaginer il y a quelques mois ...

[Invité scouser#9]

Encore heureux

[Lexclub]

J'espère simplement qu'on aura pas un nom ridicule à la Emirates ! Ou bien qu'on ait un naming mais qu'on appelle couramment le stade 'Stanley Park' de cette façon tout le monde est content : le sponsor à sa pub, le club encaisse et les supporters n'ont pas envie de pleurer constamment.

[Invité scouser#9]

Je vote pour "King Kenny Park"

Ça va faire tout drôle n’empêche de quitter Anfield

[anfieldman]

Stanley Park...c'est pas jolie comme nom !

[redshirt]

Stanley Park...c'est pas jolie comme nom !

Moi j'aime bien c'est basique, un peu comme anfield en fait

[Brittanyred]

Stanley, ca rappelle le hockey, et la coupe du même nom. Celle que connaît bien l'ancien club de hockey de M. Gillett...

[Invité scouser#9]

Ouh qu'elle est cultivée britanny ^^

[anfieldman]

J'aurais préféré Mersey Stadium ou Anfieldman park enfin bon...

[kikinou]

Ouh qu'elle est cultivée britanny ^^

elle est cultivée , et en plus elle a une chevelure magnifique , ce qui n'enléve rien à la beauté de cette personne !

une tête bien faite et une tete bien pleine , le mélange entre britanny spears et marie curry

[Brittanyred]

Ouh qu'elle est cultivée britanny ^^

Elle porte aussi très bien la moustache, a des cheveux "gone with the wind" et une voix de basse chantante et... elle s'appelle Erwan.

Brittany = Bretagne